Latest videos by hackenbollox

Critical analysis of Case for a creator part 1.flv
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 594 seconds

Support Extantdodo

Related: creationism, evolution, extantdodo, science

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Critical Analysis of A question of origins 5 6.flv
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 598 seconds

Support Extantdodo!

Related: creationism, evolution, extantdodo, science

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Critical analysis of A question on Origins (6 6).flv
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 588 seconds

Support Extantdodo

Related: creationism, evolution, extantdodo, science

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Critical Analysis of A Question of Origins (1 6).flv
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 439 seconds

Excellent video by Extantdodo
Please support Extantdodo in having their channel reinstated.

Related: biology, creationism, evolution, extantdodo, science

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Critical Analysis of A Question of Origins.flv
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 531 seconds

Please support Extantdodo from their censorship by cretinists.
http://uk.youtube .com/watch?v=GCOg52D twLc

Related: extantdodo, science

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Godless and free.flv
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 350 seconds

Par Condell's removed video. Please support Pat by mirroring this video. Don't let the fundies use youtube to curb our freedom of expression.

Related: atheism, comedy

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Critical analysis of Case for a creator part 2
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 559 seconds

Support Extantdodo

Related: creationism, extantdodo, reason, science

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Critical analysis of Case for a creator part 3
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 584 seconds

Support Extantdodo

Related: creationism, extantdodo, reason, science

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Critical analysis of Case for a creator part 5
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 591 seconds

Support Extantdodo

Related: creationism, extantdodo, reason, science

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Critical analysis of Case for a creator part 10
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 570 seconds

Support Extantdodo

Related: creationism, extantdodo, reason, science

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Critical Analysis of A Question of Origins 3 6.flv
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 467 seconds

Support Extantdodo!

Related: creationism, evolution, extantdodo, science

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Try To Keep Up
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 42 seconds

Rough!

Related: surfer

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Re: A Question for Atheists on Atheism
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 74 seconds

Video Cam Direct Upload

Related: agnosticism, atheism, beliefs, christianity, debates, philosophy, religion, science

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

The Theory Of Evolution Completely Vindicated In Under 3 Minutes....flv
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 146 seconds

Evolution science critical thinking

Related: creationism, evolution, science

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Re: The Blasphemy Challenge
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 10 seconds

Video Cam Direct Upload

Related: atheism, atheist, awesome, blasphemy, challenge, christianity, genius, god, holy, jesus, logic, rational, response, science, spirit

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

(cont) I've ...
By: hackenbollox. on 28 Oct 08, 02:13:36
(cont) I've spent a few weeks having a look at all the news sources except the US ones. They can't be trusted to remain objective. I've also watched video interviews, speeches, debates, etc. Conclusion: Sarah Palin is the biggest threat to face the world at the moment. She talks about god's work with that glazed look in her eye. She also can't string together a coherent sentence. Based on recent evidence, that may be a qualification. :)))

We don't have a ...
By: hackenbollox. on 28 Oct 08, 02:10:41
We don't have a president. Being a theocracy, we have a parliament and ministers. Currently, the prime minister is called Gordon Brown. He used to be the Chancellor, which means he was in charge of financial policies. As for your second question, I rarely favour one politician over another. I think that anybody who wants the job should on no account be allowed to do it.

Ummm...too bad you ...
By: cjla1987. on 28 Oct 08, 02:05:45
Ummm...too bad you are in the U.K. Speaking of which, who's your president over in the U.K.? I do not get to hear much from Western Civilazation. I just want to get a taste of your background and then we could discuss Politics. After this, in a nutshell, why would you vote for Obama?

I'm in UK, so I ...
By: hackenbollox. on 28 Oct 08, 00:47:32
I'm in UK, so I don't get to vote in this one. In my opinion, though, McCain would be a mistake. I'm not completely sold on Obama, but Sarah Palin should never be allowed even the possibility of getting her hands on the nuclear codes. She's one scary bird.

Ohhh okay. I am ...
By: cjla1987. on 28 Oct 08, 00:37:45
Ohhh okay. I am going to have to get my words back. In any case, I'd like to chat with you (take you head on) on a specific subject. I have ssen you have responded to all my comments so I wanna have a debate with you. Seems to me Religion is not your favorite subject (since you refute it with such great joy) Do you like Politics? Who are you voting for?

No, mate. The ...
By: hackenbollox. on 28 Oct 08, 00:32:08
No, mate. The reason for my comments in this video is that it was a specific response to a sepcific question. See the video that preceded it and you will see. I deny the existence of any and all gods.

I think you are ...
By: cjla1987. on 27 Oct 08, 17:49:42
I think you are contradicting yourself by your video. Yoo said: I attack all irrational belief systems. I'm sorry you feel I have singled out your particular delusion, but that is never my intent. If that was true, you would then have just said "I deny any God" But you specifically deny the Holy Spirit. C'mon, man, you have to agree that you contradicted yourself. Let us not make any excuses. You are better thn that. Did you or did you not contradicted yourself?

I attack all ...
By: hackenbollox. on 27 Oct 08, 16:18:19
I attack all irrational belief systems. I'm sorry you feel I have singled out your particular delusion, but that is never my intent. When I say there is no god, I mean there is no god. Not just yours, but thor, baal, zeus, poseidon, etc.

...but you know you ...
By: cjla1987. on 27 Oct 08, 15:39:02
...but you know you have a different set of belifs and unlike Theological arguments, when it comes to how to live a good life, in this issue we can prove you wrong or right. You and others attack Christians but why not attack Muslims or Muhammad? Say something about Muahhamad and you might hear or see s different reactions.They will even kill if you offend Muahhamad explicitly.

I do understand ...
By: cjla1987. on 27 Oct 08, 15:35:45
I do understand what you said to the fullest degree. Look, I am well aware of the weak points that the Bible has and I am not going to cover them by some bulllshit (I think you liked that) But hackenbollox, what I am upset to see in here is this this fucken Jerry Springer show (Athiest versus Religious people) and you are part of the audience saying "I deny the Holy Spirit" and people will go "Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!" Leave Christians alone. Maybe they piss you for their beliefs (Cont)

It won't help. ...
By: hackenbollox. on 27 Oct 08, 11:09:09
It won't help. Regardless of how you try to define god, you are still left with a simple problem. Why would I describe love or justice as god when I can simply describe them as love or justice. You simply can't cite the bible as a source for the simple fact that it has no credibility. Still no evidence.

hackenbollow, what ...
By: cjla1987. on 26 Oct 08, 18:50:57
hackenbollow, what I am trying to get to is that you believe in concepts whereas God it's a concept too. The Bible describes God as love, justice, and other concepts as well. Never and forever try to see God as a man in the sky or somewhere in the Universe, why would you? When people say God is Love it is indeed because God is Love. God is a multi-conceptual being. And that, my friend, is where are you mistaking. I hope this helps you when you talk about God.

I do believe in ...
By: hackenbollox. on 25 Oct 08, 10:46:50
I do believe in love, yes. how does that support the existence of god. As I said, no evidence.

To say there is no ...
By: cjla1987. on 24 Oct 08, 23:13:18
To say there is no evidence it is different to say there is no evidence at all. There are many natural arguments, phylosphiocal or even for that matter, operational if favor for the existence of God or a supernatual being. Now I ask you hackenbollox, do you believe in LOVE? More specifically the CONCEPTUALIZED FORM?

And there's where ...
By: hackenbollox. on 24 Oct 08, 09:40:05
And there's where your argument completely fails. The lack of evidence in itself is compelling. There is no god, that's almost certain.

Great stuff. ...
By: lucidatheist. on 24 Oct 08, 06:01:07
Great stuff. Absolutely no evidence indeed! 5 Stars from a a fellow atheist.

I ask this: how are ...
By: cjla1987. on 24 Oct 08, 01:12:27
I ask this: how are you going to apply physical laws to a non-physical being? Why would you?! You want evidence? Show me the evidence of justice, love, time, numbers! Where's the evidence?! These are concepts! And you do not deny their existence! God is a concept. That is what you ought to understand. Just like the concept of "The Face of America" What does that mean? If you go on an airplane and see down, California, Nevada and all of those will form a face?

Evidence? Show me ...
By: hackenbollox. on 23 Oct 08, 21:13:45
Evidence? Show me the evidence, man! And I don't mean anecdotal stories of how people behave. Both the anecdotes and the behaviour are easily falsified and, I'm sure, explained without a deity.

Well, in fact, God ...
By: cjla1987. on 23 Oct 08, 19:06:25
Well, in fact, God does not exist in and of itself, but in parts of many-dimensional entities. Never in the Bibles says God as physical being. You know... people have that concept of God, the-big-guns-upstaris, you know what I am sayin'? I can see the effects of time and also I can see the effects of God that has upon people when they follow him. Now, see the connection Einstein.

Very clever. NOT! ...
By: hackenbollox. on 23 Oct 08, 03:40:55
Very clever. NOT! In fact, time doesn't exist in and of itself, but it forms a part of a four-dimensional entity known as spacetime. Go read some Einstein, Einstein.

Jajajajaja! Well, ...
By: cjla1987. on 23 Oct 08, 03:16:15
Jajajajaja! Well, I deny the existence of TIME. Pretty Simple. NO EVIDENCE. Bye. ^_^

Hey ... you've got ...
By: msginca. on 19 Oct 08, 20:29:45
Hey ... you've got *my vote!*

Who Am I?
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 7 seconds

Gag

Related: joke

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Re: Liars For Darwin II : The Natural Selection Tautology
Posted by: hackenbollox

Video duration: 19 seconds

Video Cam Direct Upload

Related: atheism, atheist, christian, creationism, darwin, darwinism, dawkins, disease, dishonest, evolution, god, hate, illness, jesus, lies, syndrome

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Of course, even ...
By: SeenAndNotSeen. on 25 Nov 08, 23:05:17
Of course, even creationists accept that natural selection occurs, and even a bit of "microevolution." The only excuse they have for denying evolution is that they claim there are no beneficial mutations. They operate on the assumption that there are certain genes that are prone to mutation, and other genes that are specific to a "kind" of animal and therefore unchangeable. Biologists, of course, recognize that all DNA is prone to mutation and that beneficial mutations do sometimes occur.

I saw the video ...
By: SeenAndNotSeen. on 25 Nov 08, 22:52:53
I saw the video you're responding to. It must be nice for creationists to close their eyes, put their hands over their ears, and pretend they've won some intellectual debate. Seriously, the guy disables all comments and ratings so that he can later brag that no one has refuted him. This is a true mark of immaturity and willful ignorance.

You can re-link the ...
By: Danmill23. on 22 Oct 08, 05:12:48
You can re-link the video to another one. Not sure how to un-link it. It's somewhere in you "my videos".

Ah it's up now. ...
By: Danmill23. on 22 Oct 08, 05:11:19
Ah it's up now. Sometimes the original video owner reserves the right to approve all video responses. It's seems like it is the case here. The link has now poped up. In case you don't get approval I always copy the address from the address bar and paste it into the description box. (just in case)

Never mind, figured ...
By: hackenbollox. on 22 Oct 08, 02:23:37
Never mind, figured it out. How do I remove a linked video, though?

Thanks for that. I ...
By: hackenbollox. on 22 Oct 08, 02:18:32
Thanks for that. I thought it would automatically be attached to the vid I was responding to. How do I do that? I just looked and can't find how to do it.

You might need to ...
By: Danmill23. on 22 Oct 08, 02:12:28
You might need to put in a link in the description box so we can see what you're responding to.